One MOSFET, one bridge, one transient — and the measured data behind every claim on the product page.
Instead of switching to an ohmmeter, the circuit breaks a biased divider for an instant and watches how the node settles. The decay rate is the impedance between the probes — which is how you get a continuity answer without ever leaving voltmeter mode.
The same bridge trick is built two different ways, tuned for opposite goals. It is worth knowing which one you are looking at, because the data further down this page comes from both.
A compact detector that clips onto the meter you already own. It is tuned for invisibility: the injected signal is deliberately small so it barely disturbs the host meter's reading, which costs signal but keeps ghost voltage down to a few millivolts.
This is the finished, shipping design — the one the product page, the user guide, and the firmware manual describe.
A self-contained meter with its own display and its own external ADC, tuned for information: a bigger reference and a much larger swing, so it can resolve the rich in-between impedance states rather than just open-or-closed.
Not a product. It is a bench concept piece — but it is the better instrument for characterizing the effect, so several of the measurements below were taken on it.
Where the data comes from. Charts labelled standalone were captured on the concept piece, whose larger signal makes the underlying behavior easiest to see. The physics is identical in both builds; only the amplitude differs, and the comparison further down puts numbers to that difference.
A voltmeter reports one number for two completely different situations, and nothing in the reading distinguishes them:
| What's really happening | A normal meter says |
|---|---|
| Probes on the same net (truly connected) | 0 V |
| Probe floating / not contacting anything | 0 V |
Wasted troubleshooting time chasing a “dead” circuit that was never really probed.
You trust a “0 V” that is really a floating probe — and reach into a circuit that is actually live.
The ohms-mode dance: power down → switch to Ω → read → switch back → power up. Slow, repetitive, and easy to leave in the wrong mode.
No mode switch. No exposed ohmmeter. No guessing what “0 V” means. It has to clear a short list of hard requirements:
Survives ±1 kV Doesn't disturb the reading No perceptible delay Compact & low power
The rest of this page is how that gets built.
A MOSFET (Q8) sits in series with the sense leg of a biased voltage divider (1.25–2.5 V). Two ADC taps straddle a bridge resistor — one tracks the bias, the other tracks the input.
Series resistors form the divider and limit current; Schottky diodes clamp the varying node once the bridge is broken; a small resistor pair sets the probe-side amplitude (smaller = less ghost voltage).
The decay rate is set by (probe impedance × node capacitance). Higher impedance → slower decay. Read direction and rate, not an exact voltage:
| Probes (bridge broken) | Differential decay | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Closed / low-Z | Fast decay | Leads Closed |
| Open / floating | Slow decay | Open Leads |
| High-Z / in-between | Intermediate decay | Maps to circuit impedance |
This is what the ADC actually samples on the standalone build (an ADS1015). Toggle the bridge and the post-toggle decay gets slower the higher the probe impedance — even a coarse 17-sample capture orders every decade from 10 kΩ to 200 MΩ (open) without overlap. A faster ADC only sharpens the separation.
A fair question for anything that injects a signal: could it harm what you're probing? Measured front-end data says no. The voltage at the probes only rises toward the reference as the leads open (it can never exceed the reference), and the current is worst near a short — about 6 µA — collapsing to single-digit nano-amps as impedance rises, exactly where a sensitive part would care.
Peaks ~0.6–0.9 V and can never exceed the reference.
Near a short — dropping to nano-amps when impedance is high.
~1.0 V at 1.25 V ref, ~1.6 V at 2.5 V ref, independent of probe R.
Here is the price of that difference in goals, measured. The standalone concept piece runs a 2.5 V reference and gets a ~340 mV span between a short and 10 MΩ — enormous headroom for resolving in-between states. Blinky Hawk deliberately gives most of that up, working with about 10 mV, because the same signal that carries information also lands on the host meter's display as ghost voltage.
| Standalone version | Blinky Hawk (parallel) | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Standalone voltmeter that detects closed leads | Ternary Open / Closed / Voltage, minimal ghost V, compact |
| ADC | ADS1015 on an isolated rail | Internal MCU ADC |
| Voltage reference | 2.5 V (LM4040) | 1.25 V (LM4060) |
| Permanent sense-divider | 1 MΩ | 1 MΩ |
| Ghost voltage on host DMM | −170 mV | −5 mV DC (~80 mV AC) |
| Signal differentiation (10 M → short) | ~340 mV | ~10 mV |
| Power draw | — | ~2 mA idle (low-power polling), 11 mA awake |
What's “ghost voltage”? The few-millivolt offset the host meter displays when the leads are open. It's cosmetic, not a measurement error: the detector sits behind very high source resistance, so probing any real circuit pins the reading to the true value — and the instant a voltage is detected, the bridge stops toggling entirely. Ghost voltage is just the small price of leaving the detector clipped on, visible only when there's nothing to measure.
Detection keeps working from 0 V all the way to ±1 kV, because it lives behind the meter's protected voltmeter inputs — nothing fragile is ever exposed. Push the input harder and the sense rail simply saturates while the protection diodes do their job; there's nothing delicate to damage. Here it is still indicating during everyday use on a live 120 VAC outlet, and under genuine abuse with −1 kV applied from a megohmmeter.
These aren't breadboard toys. The standalone build runs on an ADS1015 / ADS1115; Blinky Hawk, the minimalist parallel build, has been validated on a Renesas RA4M1, an RP2040 (XIAO), and a SAMD21 (QT Py). Every ADC + MCU combination tried functions as expected.